KMID : 0881720200350030225
|
|
Journal of Food Hygiene and Safety 2020 Volume.35 No. 3 p.225 ~ p.233
|
|
Formaldehyde Monitoring of Hygiene Products in Domestic Market
|
|
Na Young-Ran
Kwon Hyeon-Jeong Cho Hyun-Nho Kim Hyeon-Jin Park Yon-Koung Park Sung-Ah Lee Seong-Ju Kang Jung-Mi
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
By the standards and specifications for hygiene products, three test methods for formaldehyde are specified for each item type of hygiene product. After derivatization using acetylacetone and 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (2,4-DNPH), formaldehyde is analyzed by spectrophotometer and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Validation of the three test methods was performed on tissue, diaper lining and waterproof layer, and panty liner products. The results of linearity (R 2 ), limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), recovery rate (%) and reproducibility (%), showed that all three methods are suitable for analyzing formaldehyde in hygiene products. After derivatization with 2,4-DNPH and acetylacetone, formaldehyde was analyzed at 0, 3, 6, 9, 24 and 48 hours by HPLC. Formaldehyde derivatized with 2,4-DNPH showed no statistically significant change in formaldehyde peak area over time (P>0.05). But, acetylacetone-derivatizated formaldehyde showed a negative correlation coefficient (r) over time (P<0.01). We investigated the residual amounts of formaldehyde in 205 hygiene products distributed in Busan. Among 74 disposable diaper products tested, 73 had low concentrations of formaldehyde (0.13-29.87 mg/kg). Moreover, formaldehyde was not detected in any of 78 tissue, 27 disposable paper towel, 12 disposable dishcloth, 7 paper cup, one brand of paper straw and 6 disposable napkin products.
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
Formaldehyde , Hygiene products
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|